Constitutional court case law

Search case law (3807 items)

Case number:
Up-717/16
ECLI:
ECLI:SI:USRS:2019:Up.717.16
Challenged act:
Operative provisions:
Abstract:
In the case at issue, the Supreme Court changed the decisive reasons for the dismissal of a claim for the refund of the value added tax. In doing so, it relied on the finding that the complainant had not previously paid the value added tax whose refund she claimed. Due to the fact that such independent and complex finding, which in itself combines both factual and legal issues (e.g. observance of the rules on the order of priority for the payment of tax liabilities and the corresponding duties), was not, in any respect (factual or legal), a subject of review by the tax authorities and the Administrative Court, the complainant could not challenge it. The Supreme Court thus deprived the complainant of the right to a legal remedy determined by Article 25 of the Constitution. Due to the fact that the first modified position of the Supreme Court denies the existence of a claim for the refund of the value added tax, while on the other hand the second modified position presupposes that such claim has arisen, the decision of the Supreme Court is based on mutually contradictory reasons. Therefore, the complainant's right to the equal protection of rights determined by Article 22 of the Constitution, which prohibits judicial arbitrariness, was also violated.
Thesaurus:
Legal basis:
Cases joined:
¤
Full text:
Type of procedure:
constitutional complaint
Type of act:
individual act
Applicant:
GPG KIPKOP d.o.o. – in liquidation, Ljubljana
Date of application:
30. 8. 2016
Date of Decision:
29. 10. 2019
Type of decision adopted:
decision
Outcome of proceedings:
annulment or annulment ab initio
Published:
Document:
AN03963

Search tips

All decisions the Constitutional Court adopted since independence of Slovenia, with the exception of orders rejecting constitutional complaints or not accepting them for consideration on the merits that contain as reasoning only the reference to the statutory basis of the decision and the composition of the panel of the Constitutional Court (the fourth paragraph of Article 55c of the Constitutional Court Act), are published on this website.

Brief instructions

Enter one or more search terms in the blank field. If your search returns too many results, try to refine it by using more precise search terms. You can also use quotation marks if you search for a precise phrase containing several words. To start your search, click on the search button.

An advanced search option is also available where you can select additional criteria, such as the date of decision, type of decision adopted, etc.
aasfdsfsddbrowseraasfdsfsddbrowser