The regulation in the Judicial Review of Administrative Acts Act which does not provide the plaintiff with a legal remedy in order to ensure judicial review of the legality of a final administrative act entails a hollowing out of the right to judicial protection. Therefore, it is inconsistent with the first paragraph of Article 23 of the Constitution. The decisions of the courts based on a regulation which does not provide for judicial review of the legality of administrative acts are also inconsistent with the first paragraph of Article 23 of the Constitution. The standpoint of the courts that judicial protection against possible human rights violations committed in an administrative procedure is ensured in the regular proceedings for judicial review of an administrative act did not interfere with the right to judicial protection.